Re: [PATCH 1/3] make migrate disable/enable conditioned on softirq_nestcnt transition

2013-12-15 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Steven Rostedt | 2013-12-05 19:45:30 [-0500]: >On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 00:42:22 +0100 >Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: >> --- a/kernel/softirq.c >> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c >> @@ -569,8 +569,8 @@ static void do_current_softirqs(int need_rcu_bh_qs) >> >> void local_bh_disable(void) >> { >> -

Re: [PATCH 1/3] make migrate disable/enable conditioned on softirq_nestcnt transition

2013-12-15 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Steven Rostedt | 2013-12-05 19:45:30 [-0500]: On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 00:42:22 +0100 Nicholas Mc Guire der.h...@hofr.at wrote: --- a/kernel/softirq.c +++ b/kernel/softirq.c @@ -569,8 +569,8 @@ static void do_current_softirqs(int need_rcu_bh_qs) void local_bh_disable(void) { -

Re: [PATCH 1/3] make migrate disable/enable conditioned on softirq_nestcnt transition

2013-12-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
BTW, Please Cc LKML when sending patches. It is the kernel you are modifying, not userspace. On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 00:42:22 +0100 Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > This patch removes the recursive calls to migrate_disable/enable in > local_bh_disable/enable > > the softirq-local-lock.patch

Re: [PATCH 1/3] make migrate disable/enable conditioned on softirq_nestcnt transition

2013-12-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
BTW, Please Cc LKML when sending patches. It is the kernel you are modifying, not userspace. On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 00:42:22 +0100 Nicholas Mc Guire der.h...@hofr.at wrote: This patch removes the recursive calls to migrate_disable/enable in local_bh_disable/enable the