Hi Boris,
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:16:43AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 19:32:51 -0700
> Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:35:56AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:58:02 +0200
> > > Andrea Adami wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2
Hi Brian,
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 19:32:51 -0700
Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Boris and Andrea,
>
> Sorry I didn't thoroughly read through this earlier discussion before
> reviewing the later versions. I also don't want to rehash old
> disagreements. But I had a few questions.
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017
Hi Boris and Andrea,
Sorry I didn't thoroughly read through this earlier discussion before
reviewing the later versions. I also don't want to rehash old
disagreements. But I had a few questions.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:35:56AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:58:02 +0200
2017-04-17 17:44 GMT+03:00 Boris Brezillon :
> Marek, Andrea,
>
> Before we even start discussing minor improvements (like coding style),
> I'd like to discuss the sharp FTL and partition table format, and
> decide whether we want to have such an old FTL included in the kernel.
>
> Actually, that's
Hi Andrea,
You know what, I give up, since even if I review and find a problem in
the FTL/partition-table format/approach, you'll keep arguing that it
should be supported in the kernel. I think I have enough things on my
plate to not spend extra time on this.
I'll let others review and take the f
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:58:02 +0200
> Andrea Adami wrote:
>
>> Boris,
>> thanks for having read it.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Boris Brezillon <
>> boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> > Marek, Andrea,
>
Hi Andrea,
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:58:02 +0200
Andrea Adami wrote:
> Boris,
> thanks for having read it.
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Boris Brezillon <
> boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Marek, Andrea,
> >
> > Before we even start discussing minor improvements (like coding
RESEND (sorry for the HTML)
Boris,
thanks for having read it.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> Marek, Andrea,
>
> Before we even start discussing minor improvements (like coding style),
> I'd like to discuss the sharp FTL and partition table format, and
> decide whether
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/15/2017 10:11 PM, Andrea Adami wrote:
>> The Sharp SL Series (Zaurus) PXA handhelds have 16/64/128M of NAND flash
>> and share the same layout of the first 7M partition, managed by Sharp FTL.
>>
>> The purpose of this self-contained patch
Marek, Andrea,
Before we even start discussing minor improvements (like coding style),
I'd like to discuss the sharp FTL and partition table format, and
decide whether we want to have such an old FTL included in the kernel.
Actually, that's the very reason I asked Andrea to post his series as
soo
On 04/15/2017 10:11 PM, Andrea Adami wrote:
> The Sharp SL Series (Zaurus) PXA handhelds have 16/64/128M of NAND flash
> and share the same layout of the first 7M partition, managed by Sharp FTL.
>
> The purpose of this self-contained patch is to add a common parser and
> remove the hardcoded size
The Sharp SL Series (Zaurus) PXA handhelds have 16/64/128M of NAND flash
and share the same layout of the first 7M partition, managed by Sharp FTL.
The purpose of this self-contained patch is to add a common parser and
remove the hardcoded sizes in the board files (these devices are not yet
conver
12 matches
Mail list logo
