Re: [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility

2016-02-08 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Linda Knippers wrote: > On 2/8/2016 2:10 PM, Linda Knippers wrote: >> On 2/8/2016 1:30 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >>> ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control >>> region entries (DCRs) per dimm. Previously we were assuming that a >>> con

Re: [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility

2016-02-08 Thread Linda Knippers
On 2/8/2016 2:10 PM, Linda Knippers wrote: > On 2/8/2016 1:30 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control >> region entries (DCRs) per dimm. Previously we were assuming that a >> control region is only present when block-data-windows are presen

Re: [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility

2016-02-08 Thread Linda Knippers
On 2/8/2016 1:30 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control > region entries (DCRs) per dimm. Previously we were assuming that a > control region is only present when block-data-windows are present. We need to give this a quick test with NVDIM

[PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility

2016-02-08 Thread Dan Williams
ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control region entries (DCRs) per dimm. Previously we were assuming that a control region is only present when block-data-windows are present. This implementation was done with an eye to be compatibility with the looser ACPI 6.0 interp