On Sat, 24 Jun 2017 02:34:06 PDT (-0700), ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> Multiple architectures define this as an empty function, and I'm adding
>> another one as part of the RISC-V port. This adds a
On Sat, 24 Jun 2017 02:34:06 PDT (-0700), ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> Multiple architectures define this as an empty function, and I'm adding
>> another one as part of the RISC-V port. This adds a __weak version of
>>
Hi Palmer,
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> Multiple architectures define this as an empty function, and I'm adding
> another one as part of the RISC-V port. This adds a __weak version of
> pci_fixup_bios and deletes the now obselete ones in a handful
Hi Palmer,
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> Multiple architectures define this as an empty function, and I'm adding
> another one as part of the RISC-V port. This adds a __weak version of
> pci_fixup_bios and deletes the now obselete ones in a handful of ports.
>
> The
Multiple architectures define this as an empty function, and I'm adding
another one as part of the RISC-V port. This adds a __weak version of
pci_fixup_bios and deletes the now obselete ones in a handful of ports.
The only functional change should be that microblaze used to export
Multiple architectures define this as an empty function, and I'm adding
another one as part of the RISC-V port. This adds a __weak version of
pci_fixup_bios and deletes the now obselete ones in a handful of ports.
The only functional change should be that microblaze used to export
6 matches
Mail list logo