On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 3:20 PM Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Thanks for digging! The problem was presumably that vmalloc_fault() will
> IRET and re-enable NMIs on the way out.
> But we’ve supported page faults on user memory in NMI handlers on 32-bit and
> 64-bit for quite a while, and it’s fine n
> On Jul 20, 2018, at 11:37 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:32:10PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> I'm just reading your changelog, and you said the PMDs are no longer
>> shared between the page tables. So this presumably means that
>> vmalloc_fault() no longer actual
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:32:10PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I'm just reading your changelog, and you said the PMDs are no longer
> shared between the page tables. So this presumably means that
> vmalloc_fault() no longer actually works correctly on PTI systems. I
> didn't read the code to
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Thomas Gleixner
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > >> > On Jul 20, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > From: Joerg Roe
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> > On Jul 20, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >> >
> >> > From: Joerg Roedel
> >> >
> >> > The ring-buffer is accessed in the NMI han
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Jul 20, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Joerg Roedel
>> >
>> > The ring-buffer is accessed in the NMI handler, so we better
>> > avoid faulting on it. Sync the vma
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:06:54AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Jul 20, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Joerg Roedel
>> >
>> > The ring-buffer is accessed in the NMI handler, so we better
>> > avoid faulting o
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Jul 20, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >
> > From: Joerg Roedel
> >
> > The ring-buffer is accessed in the NMI handler, so we better
> > avoid faulting on it. Sync the vmalloc range with all
> > page-tables in system to make sure everyon
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:06:54AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Jul 20, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >
> > From: Joerg Roedel
> >
> > The ring-buffer is accessed in the NMI handler, so we better
> > avoid faulting on it. Sync the vmalloc range with all
> > page-tables in system
> On Jul 20, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
> From: Joerg Roedel
>
> The ring-buffer is accessed in the NMI handler, so we better
> avoid faulting on it. Sync the vmalloc range with all
> page-tables in system to make sure everyone has it mapped.
>
> This fixes a WARN_ON_ONCE() that can
From: Joerg Roedel
The ring-buffer is accessed in the NMI handler, so we better
avoid faulting on it. Sync the vmalloc range with all
page-tables in system to make sure everyone has it mapped.
This fixes a WARN_ON_ONCE() that can be triggered with PTI
enabled on x86-32:
WARNING: CPU: 4
11 matches
Mail list logo