Re: [PATCH 1/3] powernv:idle: Use correct IDLE_THREAD_BITS in POWER8/9

2017-04-13 Thread Gautham R Shenoy
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:00:47PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michael Neuling writes: > > > On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 17:16 +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > >> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > >> > >> This patch ensures that POWER8 and POWER9 processors use the correct > >> value of IDLE_THREAD_B

Re: [PATCH 1/3] powernv:idle: Use correct IDLE_THREAD_BITS in POWER8/9

2017-04-13 Thread Michael Ellerman
Michael Neuling writes: > On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 17:16 +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: >> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" >> >> This patch ensures that POWER8 and POWER9 processors use the correct >> value of IDLE_THREAD_BITS as POWER8 has 8 threads per core and hence >> the IDLE_THREAD_BITS should be

Re: [PATCH 1/3] powernv:idle: Use correct IDLE_THREAD_BITS in POWER8/9

2017-04-12 Thread Michael Neuling
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 17:16 +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > This patch ensures that POWER8 and POWER9 processors use the correct > value of IDLE_THREAD_BITS as POWER8 has 8 threads per core and hence > the IDLE_THREAD_BITS should be 0xFF while POWER9 has only 4 thr

[PATCH 1/3] powernv:idle: Use correct IDLE_THREAD_BITS in POWER8/9

2017-04-12 Thread Gautham R. Shenoy
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" This patch ensures that POWER8 and POWER9 processors use the correct value of IDLE_THREAD_BITS as POWER8 has 8 threads per core and hence the IDLE_THREAD_BITS should be 0xFF while POWER9 has only 4 threads per core and hence the IDLE_THREAD_BITS should be 0xF. Signed-of