On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 20:29 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Davidlohr Bueso
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 11:54 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Davidlohr Bueso
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:29 -0600, Shuah
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 20:29 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Davidlohr Bueso davidlohr.bu...@hp.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 11:54 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Davidlohr Bueso
davidlohr.bu...@hp.com wrote:
On Tue,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 11:54 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Davidlohr Bueso
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:29 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Davidlohr Bueso
>> >>
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 11:54 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Davidlohr Bueso
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:29 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Davidlohr Bueso
> >> wrote:
> >> > This provides nicer message output. Since it seems
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 11:54 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Davidlohr Bueso
davidlohr.bu...@hp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:29 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Davidlohr Bueso davidlohr.bu...@hp.com
wrote:
This provides nicer
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Davidlohr Bueso davidlohr.bu...@hp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 11:54 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Davidlohr Bueso
davidlohr.bu...@hp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:29 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Davidlohr Bueso
wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:29 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Davidlohr Bueso
>> wrote:
>> > This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
>> > for the nature of this module, also use
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:29 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Davidlohr Bueso
> wrote:
> > This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
> > for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO instead of other
> > levels.
>
> Why are you changing
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
> for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO instead of other
> levels.
Why are you changing the ALERTs to INFO?
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
> ---
>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Davidlohr Bueso davidlohr.bu...@hp.com wrote:
This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO instead of other
levels.
Why are you changing the ALERTs to INFO?
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:29 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Davidlohr Bueso davidlohr.bu...@hp.com
wrote:
This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO instead of other
levels.
Why are you
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Davidlohr Bueso
davidlohr.bu...@hp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:29 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Davidlohr Bueso davidlohr.bu...@hp.com
wrote:
This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
for the
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:47 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:44 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:20 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
> > > for the nature of this module, also use
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:44 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:20 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
> > for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO instead of other
> > levels.
> []
> > diff --git
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:20 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
> for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO instead of other
> levels.
[]
> diff --git a/lib/rbtree_test.c b/lib/rbtree_test.c
[]
> @@ -153,7 +156,7 @@ static int
This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO instead of other
levels.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
---
lib/rbtree_test.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/rbtree_test.c
This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO instead of other
levels.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso davidlohr.bu...@hp.com
---
lib/rbtree_test.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:20 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO instead of other
levels.
[]
diff --git a/lib/rbtree_test.c b/lib/rbtree_test.c
[]
@@ -153,7 +156,7 @@ static int
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:44 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:20 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO instead of other
levels.
[]
diff --git a/lib/rbtree_test.c
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:47 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:44 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:20 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
This provides nicer message output. Since it seems more appropriate
for the nature of this module, also use KERN_INFO
20 matches
Mail list logo
