Hello!
On 08/19/2013 10:25 AM, Ionut Nicu wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] regmap: flat: use the cache_present bitmap
> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:16:49 +0200
> From: Ionut Nicu
> To: ext Mark Brown
> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman ,
> linux-k
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:17:12AM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
> Do you have any feedback for this patch?
Not yet, please allow some time for response especially over weekends.
> If you think the change is too complex, I have a simpler solution that could
> make
> things work with devices th
Hi Mark,
On 09.08.2013 19:16, Ionut Nicu wrote:
> On 09.08.2013 13:44, ext Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
>>> As opposed to the other regmap cache implementations,
>>> regcache_flat didn't use the cache_present bitmap for
>>> figuring out whether a
On 09.08.2013 13:44, ext Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
>> As opposed to the other regmap cache implementations,
>> regcache_flat didn't use the cache_present bitmap for
>> figuring out whether a register was cached or not, nor
>> did it mark a regis
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
> As opposed to the other regmap cache implementations,
> regcache_flat didn't use the cache_present bitmap for
> figuring out whether a register was cached or not, nor
> did it mark a register as present in the cache when
> regcache_flat_
As opposed to the other regmap cache implementations,
regcache_flat didn't use the cache_present bitmap for
figuring out whether a register was cached or not, nor
did it mark a register as present in the cache when
regcache_flat_write() was called.
This caused incorrect behaviour, such as returnin
6 matches
Mail list logo
