On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:56:46AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:44 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 01:55:10AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Possible speed improvement of the __do_softirq function by using ffs
> > > instead of using a while loo
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:44 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 01:55:10AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Possible speed improvement of the __do_softirq function by using ffs
> > instead of using a while loop with an & 1 test then single bit shift.
[]
> Perhaps using for_each
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 01:55:10AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> Possible speed improvement of the __do_softirq function by using ffs
> instead of using a while loop with an & 1 test then single bit shift.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
> ---
> kernel/softirq.c | 43 ++-
Possible speed improvement of the __do_softirq function by using ffs
instead of using a while loop with an & 1 test then single bit shift.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
---
kernel/softirq.c | 43 ++-
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --g
4 matches
Mail list logo