>
>>
>> =
>> spi: xilinx - minimize iomem reads
>>
>> If this IP core is accessed through bridges like PCI-e, reads are rather
>> costly. Doing many reads or read-modify-writes is thus long and strenuous
>> on the CPU (active waiting).
>>
>> The transfer workflow of
>
>>
>> =
>> spi: xilinx - minimize iomem reads
>>
>> If this IP core is accessed through bridges like PCI-e, reads are rather
>> costly. Doing many reads or read-modify-writes is thus long and strenuous
>> on the CPU (active waiting).
>>
>> The transfer workflow of
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Jean-Francois Dagenais
wrote:
>
>> On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> Applied but this is a bit sad, having to defer the refill to process
>> context means that we're adding extra latency which takes us further
>> away from being able to saturate
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Jean-Francois Dagenais
wrote:
>
>> On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> Applied but this is a bit sad, having to defer the refill to process
>> context means that we're adding extra latency which takes us
> On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> Applied but this is a bit sad, having to defer the refill to process
> context means that we're adding extra latency which takes us further
> away from being able to saturate the bus. There ought to be a way to
> avoid the issue though I
> On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> Applied but this is a bit sad, having to defer the refill to process
> context means that we're adding extra latency which takes us further
> away from being able to saturate the bus. There ought to be a way to
> avoid the
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:02:34PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> The ISR currently consumes the rx buffer data and re-enables transmission
> from within interrupt context. This is bad because if the interrupt
> occurs again before the ISR exits, the new interrupt will be erroneously
> cleared by
From: Peter Crosthwaite
The ISR currently consumes the rx buffer data and re-enables transmission
from within interrupt context. This is bad because if the interrupt
occurs again before the ISR exits, the new interrupt will be erroneously
cleared by the still completing ISR.
Simplified the ISR
From: Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com
The ISR currently consumes the rx buffer data and re-enables transmission
from within interrupt context. This is bad because if the interrupt
occurs again before the ISR exits, the new interrupt will be erroneously
cleared by the still
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:02:34PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
The ISR currently consumes the rx buffer data and re-enables transmission
from within interrupt context. This is bad because if the interrupt
occurs again before the ISR exits, the new interrupt will be erroneously
cleared by the
10 matches
Mail list logo