On 07/16/2012 05:28 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> On 07/12/2012 07:01 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
But your vote would count for a lot more if you know of some app which
would really
On 07/16/2012 05:28 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Jeff Liu wrote:
On 07/12/2012 07:01 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
But your vote would count for a lot more if you know of some app which
would really benefit from this
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Jeff Liu wrote:
> On 07/12/2012 07:01 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >>
> >> But your vote would count for a lot more if you know of some app which
> >> would really benefit from this functionality in tmpfs: I've
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Jeff Liu wrote:
On 07/12/2012 07:01 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
But your vote would count for a lot more if you know of some app which
would really benefit from this functionality in tmpfs: I've heard of none.
On 07/12/2012 07:01 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 at 22:41 GMT, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Revert 4fb5ef089b28 ("tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE").
I believe it's
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > If you don't have burden to maintain it, I'd prefer to leave as it is,
> > > I don't think 752-bytes is the reason we revert it.
> >
> >
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 at 22:41 GMT, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > Revert 4fb5ef089b28 ("tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE").
> > > I believe it's correct, and it's been nice to have from rc1
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 at 22:41 GMT, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Revert 4fb5ef089b28 ("tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE").
> > I believe it's correct, and it's been nice to have from rc1 to rc6;
> > but as the original commit said:
> >
> > I don't know who
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 at 22:41 GMT, Hugh Dickins hu...@google.com wrote:
Revert 4fb5ef089b28 (tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE).
I believe it's correct, and it's been nice to have from rc1 to rc6;
but as the original commit said:
I don't know
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 at 22:41 GMT, Hugh Dickins hu...@google.com wrote:
Revert 4fb5ef089b28 (tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE).
I believe it's correct, and it's been nice to have from
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
If you don't have burden to maintain it, I'd prefer to leave as it is,
I don't think 752-bytes is the reason we revert it.
Thank you, your
On 07/12/2012 07:01 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 at 22:41 GMT, Hugh Dickins hu...@google.com wrote:
Revert 4fb5ef089b28 (tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE).
I believe it's
Revert 4fb5ef089b28 ("tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE").
I believe it's correct, and it's been nice to have from rc1 to rc6;
but as the original commit said:
I don't know who actually uses SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, and whether it
would be of any use to them on tmpfs. This code adds 92 lines
Revert 4fb5ef089b28 (tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE).
I believe it's correct, and it's been nice to have from rc1 to rc6;
but as the original commit said:
I don't know who actually uses SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, and whether it
would be of any use to them on tmpfs. This code adds 92 lines
14 matches
Mail list logo
