On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 11:50:08PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:55:12AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> > > need to hold a kref on the
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 11:50:08PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:55:12AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> > > need to hold a kref on the
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:55:12AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> > need to hold a kref on the chip to make sure it isn't freed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> need to hold a kref on the chip to make sure it isn't freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
I'm bit confused about this patch. What is the regression if this needs
to
Hi Jarkko,
I found a bug in this last night, please hold off.
Jason
On Feb 13, 2016 3:08 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> > need to hold a kref on the chip to make
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> need to hold a kref on the chip to make sure it isn't freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
For rest of the patches I'll look at them
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> need to hold a kref on the chip to make sure it isn't freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
Hi Jarkko,
I found a bug in this last night, please hold off.
Jason
On Feb 13, 2016 3:08 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> > need to
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> need to hold a kref on the chip to make sure it isn't freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
I'm bit confused about this patch. What
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:55:12AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> > need to hold a kref on the chip to make sure it isn't freed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
need to hold a kref on the chip to make sure it isn't freed.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 2 ++
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git
This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
need to hold a kref on the chip to make sure it isn't freed.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 2 ++
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff
12 matches
Mail list logo