On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:33:44PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> uprobe_events counts the number of uprobes in uprobes_tree but
> it is used as a boolean. We can use RB_EMPTY_ROOT() instead.
>
> Probably no_uprobe_events() added by this patch can have more
> callers, say, mmf_recalc_uprobes().
>
On 12/13, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov [2012-11-25 23:33:44]:
almost month ago ;)
> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju
Thanks!
but what about 2/3 and 3/3?
I'd like to send the final (and technically trivial) series which
actually turns the filtering on.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe fro
* Oleg Nesterov [2012-11-25 23:33:44]:
> uprobe_events counts the number of uprobes in uprobes_tree but
> it is used as a boolean. We can use RB_EMPTY_ROOT() instead.
>
Nice idea.
> Probably no_uprobe_events() added by this patch can have more
> callers, say, mmf_recalc_uprobes().
>
> Signed-
uprobe_events counts the number of uprobes in uprobes_tree but
it is used as a boolean. We can use RB_EMPTY_ROOT() instead.
Probably no_uprobe_events() added by this patch can have more
callers, say, mmf_recalc_uprobes().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 19 +++--
4 matches
Mail list logo