On 24.07.20 01:15, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> The macro is not used anywhere, and has an incorrect value (going by the
> comment) on x86_64 since commit
> c898faf91b3e ("x86: 46 bit physical address support on 64 bits")
>
> To avoid confusion, just remove the definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind S
The macro is not used anywhere, and has an incorrect value (going by the
comment) on x86_64 since commit
c898faf91b3e ("x86: 46 bit physical address support on 64 bits")
To avoid confusion, just remove the definition.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar
---
arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 6 +
2 matches
Mail list logo
