On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:40:57PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
[...]
> I was doing some thinking about what to do, then. I wondered whether
> the right thing to do is not to make a "rk3288 syscon" driver that
> configures these bits, but rather to make a "rk3288" driver has access
> to the syscon.
Thierry,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:38:57AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Thierry,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Thierry Reding
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:20:31PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> >> Am Mittwoch, 20.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 05:49:22PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 21.08.2014 17:38, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Thierry,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:20:31PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >>> Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 08:55:0
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:38:57AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Thierry,
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:20:31PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >> Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 08:55:09 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> >> > Thierry,
> >> >
> >>
Am Donnerstag, 21. August 2014, 08:24:22 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:55:09AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > Looking at the register offsets in the device tree that seems likely. At
> > > least PWMs 0
On 21.08.2014 17:38, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Thierry,
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:20:31PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>> Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 08:55:09 schrieb Doug Anderson:
Thierry,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:
Thierry and Heiko
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:55:09AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Thierry Reding
>> wrote:
> [...]
>> > Looking at the register offsets in the device tree that seems likely. At
>> > leas
Thierry,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:20:31PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 08:55:09 schrieb Doug Anderson:
>> > Thierry,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Thierry Reding
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> > > On We
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:20:31PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 08:55:09 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> > Thierry,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Thierry Reding
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:20:53AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > >> Thierry,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:55:09AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
[...]
> > Looking at the register offsets in the device tree that seems likely. At
> > least PWMs 0 and 1 as well as 2 and 3 seem like they could be in the
> > same IP block.
Heiko,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 09:27:02 schrieb Doug Anderson:
>> Heiko,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> > Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 08:55:09 schrieb Doug Anderson:
>> >> Thierry,
>> >>
>> >> On Wed
Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 09:27:02 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Heiko,
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 08:55:09 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> >> Thierry,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Thierry Reding
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On
Heiko,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 08:55:09 schrieb Doug Anderson:
>> Thierry,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Thierry Reding
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:20:53AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> >> Thierry,
>> >>
>>
Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 08:55:09 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Thierry,
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Thierry Reding
>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:20:53AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> Thierry,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Thierry Reding
> >>
> >> wrote:
Thierry,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:20:53AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Thierry,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Thierry Reding
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:18:54AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> >> Thierry,
>> >>
>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:20:53AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Thierry,
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:18:54AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> Thierry,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Thierry Reding
> >> wrote:
> >> > O
Thierry,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:18:54AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Thierry,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Thierry Reding
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:09:06AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> >> The rk3288 SoC
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:18:54AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Thierry,
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:09:06AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> The rk3288 SoC has an option to switch all of the PWMs in the system
> >> between the old
Thierry,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:09:06AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> The rk3288 SoC has an option to switch all of the PWMs in the system
>> between the old IP block and the new IP block. The new IP block is
>> working and tested an
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:09:06AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> The rk3288 SoC has an option to switch all of the PWMs in the system
> between the old IP block and the new IP block. The new IP block is
> working and tested and the suggested PWM to use, so setup the SoC to
> use it and then we can
Sonny,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Sonny Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> The rk3288 SoC has an option to switch all of the PWMs in the system
>> between the old IP block and the new IP block. The new IP block is
>> working and tested and the suggeste
The rk3288 SoC has an option to switch all of the PWMs in the system
between the old IP block and the new IP block. The new IP block is
working and tested and the suggested PWM to use, so setup the SoC to
use it and then we can pretend that the other IP block doesn't exist.
This code could go lot
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> The rk3288 SoC has an option to switch all of the PWMs in the system
> between the old IP block and the new IP block. The new IP block is
> working and tested and the suggested PWM to use, so setup the SoC to
> use it and then we can preten
23 matches
Mail list logo