On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > I have rebased
> > gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch
> > on top of the $subject series, the result is appended. It has only been
> > compilation tested for now,
On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I have rebased
gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch
on top of the $subject series, the result is appended. It has only been
compilation tested for now, but I'll be
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I have rebased gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch
> on top of the $subject series, the result is appended. It has only been
> compilation tested for now, but I'll be testing it for the next couple of
> days.
>
> Please
On Friday, 4 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > >
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sometimes is
On Friday, 4 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I have rebased gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch
on top of the $subject series, the result is appended. It has only been
compilation tested for now, but I'll be testing it for the next couple of
days.
Please
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > It sometimes is necessary to destroy a device object during a suspend or
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > It sometimes is necessary to destroy a device object during a suspend or
> > hibernation, but the PM core is supposed to control all
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> It sometimes is necessary to destroy a device object during a suspend or
> hibernation, but the PM core is supposed to control all device objects in that
> cases. For this reason, it is
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sometimes is necessary to destroy a device object during a suspend or
hibernation, but the PM core is supposed to control all device objects in that
cases. For this reason, it is necessary
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sometimes is necessary to destroy a device object during a suspend or
hibernation, but the PM core is supposed to control all device
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sometimes is necessary to destroy a device object during a suspend or
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It sometimes is necessary to destroy a device object during a suspend or
hibernation, but the PM core is supposed to control all device objects in that
cases. For this reason, it is necessary to introduce a mechanism allowing one
to ask the PM core to
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sometimes is necessary to destroy a device object during a suspend or
hibernation, but the PM core is supposed to control all device objects in that
cases. For this reason, it is necessary to introduce a mechanism allowing one
to ask the PM core to
16 matches
Mail list logo
