Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-07 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi, On 05/10/2020 13:38:27-0500, Rob Herring wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/ingenic,rtc.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/ingenic,rtc.yaml > index bc2c7e53a28e..60e93e86ad9d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/ingenic,rtc.yaml > +++ b/Doc

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can > check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present > in schemas. > > 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schem

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-06 Thread Mathieu Poirier
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 12:38, Rob Herring wrote: > > This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can > check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present > in schemas. > > 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via > '$

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/5/20 11:38 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can > check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present > in schemas. > > 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via > '$ref') and

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-06 Thread Ulf Hansson
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 20:38, Rob Herring wrote: > > This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can > check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present > in schemas. > > 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via > '$

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Rob, On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:39 PM Rob Herring wrote: > This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can > check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present > in schemas. > > 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-05 Thread Vinod Koul
On 05-10-20, 13:38, Rob Herring wrote: > This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can > check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present > in schemas. > > 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via > '$ref') and a

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-05 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can > check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present > in schemas. > > 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schem

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-05 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can > check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present > in schemas. > > 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schem

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can > check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present > in schemas. Acked-by: Mark Brown signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

2020-10-05 Thread Rob Herring
This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present in schemas. 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via '$ref') and all possible properties and/or child nodes are not e