Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Add missing minItems for 8192/8195

2025-04-18 Thread AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Il 19/03/25 15:25, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto: On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 08:16:37AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On 18/03/2025 23:22, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: Both MT8192 and MT8195 have an L1TCM memory, so it should be described in reg, and therefore reg's minItems should be 3,

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Add missing minItems for 8192/8195

2025-03-19 Thread Nícolas F . R . A . Prado
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 08:16:37AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 18/03/2025 23:22, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > > Both MT8192 and MT8195 have an L1TCM memory, so it should be described > > in reg, and therefore reg's minItems should be 3, as is already implicit > > by reg-names. Overrid

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Add missing minItems for 8192/8195

2025-03-19 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 18/03/2025 23:22, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > Both MT8192 and MT8195 have an L1TCM memory, so it should be described > in reg, and therefore reg's minItems should be 3, as is already implicit > by reg-names. Override minItems to 3 for MT8192 and MT8195. I think that was the original intenti

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Add missing minItems for 8192/8195

2025-03-18 Thread Nícolas F . R . A . Prado
Both MT8192 and MT8195 have an L1TCM memory, so it should be described in reg, and therefore reg's minItems should be 3, as is already implicit by reg-names. Override minItems to 3 for MT8192 and MT8195. Fixes: 6b55b1e2fd7f ("dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP") Signe