On Wednesday 02 October 2013 16:42:27 David Rientjes wrote:
> The purpose of SYMBOL_WRITE is in sym_calc_value() where it is set if the
> config symbol is visible and settable by the user, which is why I
> suggested it be specified as being writable by the user.
Then this looks strange to me: a
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Martin Walch wrote:
> So, if I have not missed anything, SYMBOL_WRITE decides whether to write a
> symbol
> to .config or not. This does not necessarily mean that the user can change
> the value.
> SYMBOL_WRITE may be set and the symbol may be written to .config while the
>
> > diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
> > index df198a5..ba663e1 100644
> > --- a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
> > +++ b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
> > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct symbol {
> > #define SYMBOL_CHOICEVAL 0x0020 /* used as a value in a choice block */
> > #define SYMB
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Martin Walch wrote:
> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
> index df198a5..ba663e1 100644
> --- a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct symbol {
> #define SYMBOL_CHOICEVAL 0x0020 /* used as a value in a choi
From: Martin Walch
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:54:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] kconfig: add short explanation to SYMBOL_WRITE
replace the question mark in the comment after SYMBOL_WRITE with an explanation
Signed-off-by: Martin Walch
---
scripts/kconfig/expr.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion
5 matches
Mail list logo
