Quoting Rob Herring (2018-11-29 17:01:54)
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:28 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-11-07 10:37:31)
> > > appropriate structure with to_platform_device() or to_i2c_client()?
> > >
> > > So the example would become
> > >
> > > struct
Quoting Rob Herring (2018-11-29 17:01:54)
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:28 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-11-07 10:37:31)
> > > appropriate structure with to_platform_device() or to_i2c_client()?
> > >
> > > So the example would become
> > >
> > > struct
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:28 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-11-07 10:37:31)
> > appropriate structure with to_platform_device() or to_i2c_client()?
> >
> > So the example would become
> >
> > struct of_driver_probe_func {
> > int (*probe)(struct device *dev);
> >
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:28 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-11-07 10:37:31)
> > appropriate structure with to_platform_device() or to_i2c_client()?
> >
> > So the example would become
> >
> > struct of_driver_probe_func {
> > int (*probe)(struct device *dev);
> >
Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-11-07 10:37:31)
> appropriate structure with to_platform_device() or to_i2c_client()?
>
> So the example would become
>
> struct of_driver_probe_func {
> int (*probe)(struct device *dev);
> };
>
> struct of_driver_probe_func mtk_probes[] = {
>
Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-11-07 10:37:31)
> appropriate structure with to_platform_device() or to_i2c_client()?
>
> So the example would become
>
> struct of_driver_probe_func {
> int (*probe)(struct device *dev);
> };
>
> struct of_driver_probe_func mtk_probes[] = {
>
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 5:59 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2018-11-09 01:56:01)
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:37 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Rob Herring (2018-11-06 12:44:52)
> > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > int
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 5:59 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2018-11-09 01:56:01)
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:37 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Rob Herring (2018-11-06 12:44:52)
> > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > int
Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2018-11-09 01:56:01)
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:37 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Rob Herring (2018-11-06 12:44:52)
> > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > int (*probe)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > };
> >
> > struct
Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2018-11-09 01:56:01)
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:37 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Rob Herring (2018-11-06 12:44:52)
> > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > int (*probe)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > };
> >
> > struct
On 11/9/18 2:36 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 11:29 AM Matthias Brugger
> wrote:
>> On 08/11/2018 18:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> +int
On 11/9/18 2:36 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 11:29 AM Matthias Brugger
> wrote:
>> On 08/11/2018 18:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> +int
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 4:36 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 11:29 AM Matthias Brugger
> wrote:
> > On 08/11/2018 18:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
> > >> On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >>> +int
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 4:36 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 11:29 AM Matthias Brugger
> wrote:
> > On 08/11/2018 18:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
> > >> On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >>> +int
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 11:29 AM Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On 08/11/2018 18:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
> >> On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>> +int platform_driver_probe_by_of_match_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 11:29 AM Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On 08/11/2018 18:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
> >> On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>> +int platform_driver_probe_by_of_match_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>
On 08/11/2018 18:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
>> On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> +int platform_driver_probe_by_of_match_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + int (*probe_func)(struct platform_device *pdev);
>>> +
>>> +
On 08/11/2018 18:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
>> On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> +int platform_driver_probe_by_of_match_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + int (*probe_func)(struct platform_device *pdev);
>>> +
>>> +
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:37 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rob Herring (2018-11-06 12:44:52)
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > We have a handful of clk drivers that have a collection of slightly
> > > variant device support keyed off of the compatible
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:37 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rob Herring (2018-11-06 12:44:52)
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > We have a handful of clk drivers that have a collection of slightly
> > > variant device support keyed off of the compatible
Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
> On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > +int platform_driver_probe_by_of_match_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + int (*probe_func)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > +
> > + probe_func = of_device_get_match_data(>dev);
>
Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
> On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > +int platform_driver_probe_by_of_match_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + int (*probe_func)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > +
> > + probe_func = of_device_get_match_data(>dev);
>
On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We have a handful of clk drivers that have a collection of slightly
> variant device support keyed off of the compatible string. In each of
> these drivers, we demux the variant and then call the "real" probe
> function based on whatever is stored in
On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We have a handful of clk drivers that have a collection of slightly
> variant device support keyed off of the compatible string. In each of
> these drivers, we demux the variant and then call the "real" probe
> function based on whatever is stored in
Quoting Rob Herring (2018-11-06 12:44:52)
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > We have a handful of clk drivers that have a collection of slightly
> > variant device support keyed off of the compatible string. In each of
> > these drivers, we demux the variant and then
Quoting Rob Herring (2018-11-06 12:44:52)
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > We have a handful of clk drivers that have a collection of slightly
> > variant device support keyed off of the compatible string. In each of
> > these drivers, we demux the variant and then
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> We have a handful of clk drivers that have a collection of slightly
> variant device support keyed off of the compatible string. In each of
> these drivers, we demux the variant and then call the "real" probe
> function based on whatever is
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> We have a handful of clk drivers that have a collection of slightly
> variant device support keyed off of the compatible string. In each of
> these drivers, we demux the variant and then call the "real" probe
> function based on whatever is
We have a handful of clk drivers that have a collection of slightly
variant device support keyed off of the compatible string. In each of
these drivers, we demux the variant and then call the "real" probe
function based on whatever is stored in the match data for that
compatible string. Let's
We have a handful of clk drivers that have a collection of slightly
variant device support keyed off of the compatible string. In each of
these drivers, we demux the variant and then call the "real" probe
function based on whatever is stored in the match data for that
compatible string. Let's
30 matches
Mail list logo
