On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> There's no need to duplicate essentially the same functions. Let's
> introduce static int pinctrl_pm_select_state() and make the other
> related functions call that.
>
> This allows us to add support later on for multiple active states,
>
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
There's no need to duplicate essentially the same functions. Let's
introduce static int pinctrl_pm_select_state() and make the other
related functions call that.
This allows us to add support later on for multiple active
There's no need to duplicate essentially the same functions. Let's
introduce static int pinctrl_pm_select_state() and make the other
related functions call that.
This allows us to add support later on for multiple active states,
and more optimized dynamic remuxing.
Note that we still need to
There's no need to duplicate essentially the same functions. Let's
introduce static int pinctrl_pm_select_state() and make the other
related functions call that.
This allows us to add support later on for multiple active states,
and more optimized dynamic remuxing.
Note that we still need to
* Grygorii Strashko [130716 07:32]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 07/16/2013 04:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Grygorii Strashko [130716 06:22]:
> >>Hi Tony,
> >>
> >>This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
> >>"[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling"
>
* Grygorii Strashko grygorii.stras...@ti.com [130716 07:32]:
Hi Tony,
On 07/16/2013 04:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Grygorii Strashko grygorii.stras...@ti.com [130716 06:22]:
Hi Tony,
This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl
Hi Tony,
On 07/16/2013 04:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Grygorii Strashko [130716 06:22]:
Hi Tony,
This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
"[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling"
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/21/309
on top of it:
Hmm this patch alone
* Grygorii Strashko [130716 06:22]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
> "[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling"
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/21/309
>
> on top of it:
Hmm this patch alone removes duplicate code and if it causes
issues I
Hi Tony,
This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
"[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling"
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/21/309
on top of it:
[0.264007] L310 cache controller enabled
[0.268310] l2x0: 16 ways, CACHE_ID 0x41c4, AUX_CTRL 0x7e47,
There's no need to duplicate essentially the same functions. Let's
introduce static int pinctrl_pm_select_state() and make the other
related functions call that.
This allows us to add support later on for multiple active states,
and more optimized dynamic remuxing.
Note that we still need to
There's no need to duplicate essentially the same functions. Let's
introduce static int pinctrl_pm_select_state() and make the other
related functions call that.
This allows us to add support later on for multiple active states,
and more optimized dynamic remuxing.
Note that we still need to
Hi Tony,
This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/21/309
on top of it:
[0.264007] L310 cache controller enabled
[0.268310] l2x0: 16 ways, CACHE_ID 0x41c4, AUX_CTRL 0x7e47,
Cache
* Grygorii Strashko grygorii.stras...@ti.com [130716 06:22]:
Hi Tony,
This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/21/309
on top of it:
Hmm this patch alone removes duplicate code and if it
Hi Tony,
On 07/16/2013 04:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Grygorii Strashko grygorii.stras...@ti.com [130716 06:22]:
Hi Tony,
This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/21/309
on top of it:
Hmm
14 matches
Mail list logo
