On October 27, 2015 4:40:42 PM GMT+05:30, Dan Carpenter
wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Dan Carpenter
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Dan Carpenter
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani
> >> wrote:
> >> Please follow standard
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Dan Carpenter
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani
>> wrote:
>> Please follow standard naming convention for the patches.
>> It should be [PATCH v2 1/4] and not
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani
> wrote:
> Please follow standard naming convention for the patches.
> It should be [PATCH v2 1/4] and not [PATCH 1/4 v2].
Does this matter? It's in a thread so it sorts
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani
> wrote:
> Please follow standard naming convention for the patches.
> It should be [PATCH v2 1/4] and not [PATCH 1/4 v2].
Does this matter? It's in a
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Dan Carpenter
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani
>> wrote:
>> Please follow standard naming convention for the
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Dan Carpenter
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani
> >>
On October 27, 2015 4:40:42 PM GMT+05:30, Dan Carpenter
wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Dan Carpenter
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani
wrote:
Please follow standard naming convention for the patches.
It should be [PATCH v2 1/4] and not [PATCH 1/4 v2].
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Use the timer API function setup_timer instead of init_timer, removing
the structure field assignments.
The simplified semantic patch used is :-
@timer@
expression e1,e2,e3,fn_ptr;
@@
-init_timer();
+setup_timer(, fn_ptr, e2);
... when != fn_ptr = e3
-e1.function = fn_ptr;
-e1.data = e2;
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani
wrote:
Please follow standard naming convention for the patches.
It should be [PATCH v2 1/4] and not [PATCH 1/4 v2].
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Use the timer API function setup_timer instead of init_timer, removing
the structure field assignments.
The simplified semantic patch used is :-
@timer@
expression e1,e2,e3,fn_ptr;
@@
-init_timer();
+setup_timer(, fn_ptr, e2);
... when != fn_ptr = e3
-e1.function = fn_ptr;
-e1.data = e2;
12 matches
Mail list logo