Re: [PATCH 1/5] m68k: use for_each_sg()

2015-05-01 Thread Akinobu Mita
2015-05-01 18:07 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven : > Hi Mita-san, > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote: >> Since m68k doesn't select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN, it is not necessary to >> use for_each_sg() in order to loop over each sg element. But this can >> help find problems with drivers

Re: [PATCH 1/5] m68k: use for_each_sg()

2015-05-01 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Mita-san, On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote: > Since m68k doesn't select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN, it is not necessary to > use for_each_sg() in order to loop over each sg element. But this can > help find problems with drivers that do not properly initialize their > sg tables when

[PATCH 1/5] m68k: use for_each_sg()

2015-04-30 Thread Akinobu Mita
Since m68k doesn't select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN, it is not necessary to use for_each_sg() in order to loop over each sg element. But this can help find problems with drivers that do not properly initialize their sg tables when CONFIG_DEBUG_SG is enabled. Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita Cc: Geert Uytterh