On 06/28/2013 08:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Ick, it did that!? and here I thought there was a difference between:
>
> int foo:1,
> bar:1;
>
> and
>
> int foo:1;
> int bar:1;
>
> That made all the difference in this particular case. I guess I should
> go read the language
On 06/28/2013 08:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Ick, it did that!? and here I thought there was a difference between:
int foo:1,
bar:1;
and
int foo:1;
int bar:1;
That made all the difference in this particular case. I guess I should
go read the language spec more
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 04:22:17PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> The capabilities bits must not be "union'ed" together.
> Put them in a separate struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 8 +---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
The capabilities bits must not be "union'ed" together.
Put them in a separate struct.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
---
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
The capabilities bits must not be union'ed together.
Put them in a separate struct.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com
---
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 04:22:17PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
The capabilities bits must not be union'ed together.
Put them in a separate struct.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com
---
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3
6 matches
Mail list logo
