Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: abx500: Staticize some symbols

2013-04-09 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > These symbols are used only in this file. Without this patch > we get the following warnings: > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:520:5: warning: > symbol 'abx500_gpio_request' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-a

Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: abx500: Staticize some symbols

2013-04-03 Thread Sachin Kamat
Hi Linus, On 19 March 2013 13:58, Patrice CHOTARD wrote: > On 03/19/2013 07:31 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > >> These symbols are used only in this file. Without this patch >> we get the following warnings: >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:520:5: warning: >> symbol 'abx500_gpio_request' was not de

Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: abx500: Staticize some symbols

2013-03-19 Thread Patrice CHOTARD
On 03/19/2013 07:31 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > These symbols are used only in this file. Without this patch > we get the following warnings: > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:520:5: warning: > symbol 'abx500_gpio_request' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:52

[PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: abx500: Staticize some symbols

2013-03-18 Thread Sachin Kamat
These symbols are used only in this file. Without this patch we get the following warnings: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:520:5: warning: symbol 'abx500_gpio_request' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:527:6: warning: symbol 'abx500_gpio_free' was not declare