Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: update the documentation for some pinconfig params

2013-06-16 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 12:26:38 schrieb Linus Walleij: >> Can't we rely on PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE for all this? > > you're the boss on this, I'll do whatever you say :-) Oh that's not good. As can be seen from past experience I am oft

Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: update the documentation for some pinconfig params

2013-06-16 Thread Heiko Stübner
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 12:26:38 schrieb Linus Walleij: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > The BIAS_DISABLE and BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE generic pinconfig options were > > missing information about their argument - which should be ignored. > > > > Also the BIAS_PULL_* optio

Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: update the documentation for some pinconfig params

2013-06-16 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > The BIAS_DISABLE and BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE generic pinconfig options were > missing information about their argument - which should be ignored. > > Also the BIAS_PULL_* options may have the pull strength as argument > when they are activated,

[PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: update the documentation for some pinconfig params

2013-06-14 Thread Heiko Stübner
The BIAS_DISABLE and BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE generic pinconfig options were missing information about their argument - which should be ignored. Also the BIAS_PULL_* options may have the pull strength as argument when they are activated, while simpler hardware can use any non-0 value for it. Update th