On Thursday, December 13, 2012 09:05:35 PM Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 12/13/2012 06:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:38:01 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >>>
> >>> Currently, as soon as an
On 12/13/2012 06:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:38:01 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>>
>>> Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
>> snip
>>
>>> @@
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 06:00:03 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
> > is created, the driver core attempts to probe ACPI drivers
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 06:00:03 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
is created, the driver core
On 12/13/2012 06:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:38:01 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
snip
@@
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 09:05:35 PM Jiang Liu wrote:
On 12/13/2012 06:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:38:01 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Currently, as soon
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
> is created, the driver core attempts to probe ACPI drivers against
> it. That leads to some unpleasant side effects, like the fact that
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:32:57 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:38:01 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> > On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
[...]
> > > static int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle, struct
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:50:06 PM Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
> > is created, the driver core attempts to probe ACPI drivers against
> > it.
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:38:01 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
> snip
>
> > @@ -1600,48 +1608,77 @@ static acpi_status
On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
snip
> @@ -1600,48 +1608,77 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac
>* We may already have an acpi_device from a previous
On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
> is created, the driver core attempts to probe ACPI drivers against
> it. That leads to some unpleasant side effects, like the fact that
> the
On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
is created, the driver core attempts to probe ACPI drivers against
it. That leads to some unpleasant side effects, like
On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
snip
@@ -1600,48 +1608,77 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac
* We may already have an acpi_device from
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:38:01 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
snip
@@ -1600,48 +1608,77 @@ static acpi_status
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:50:06 PM Jiang Liu wrote:
On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
is created, the driver core attempts to probe ACPI
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:32:57 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:38:01 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
On 12/10/2012 07:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
[...]
static int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle,
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
is created, the driver core attempts to probe ACPI drivers against
it. That leads to some unpleasant
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
is created, the driver core attempts to probe ACPI drivers against
it. That leads to some unpleasant side effects, like the fact that
the boot code path for ACPI namespace scanning is different from
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Currently, as soon as an ACPI device node object (struct acpi_device)
is created, the driver core attempts to probe ACPI drivers against
it. That leads to some unpleasant side effects, like the fact that
the boot code path for ACPI namespace
20 matches
Mail list logo
