On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:00:11PM +, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 03:15:29PM +, David Howells wrote:
>
> > > - it adds #ifdef's in fs/binfmt_elf.c for code that is anyway
> > > scheduled for removal in 2.6.25
> >
> > I'm told (by Ralf) that removing this support will b
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 03:15:29PM +, David Howells wrote:
> > - it adds #ifdef's in fs/binfmt_elf.c for code that is anyway
> > scheduled for removal in 2.6.25
>
> I'm told (by Ralf) that removing this support will break Castle Wolfenstein or
> something like that.
>
> So unless you want
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - it adds #ifdef's in fs/binfmt_elf.c for code that is anyway
> scheduled for removal in 2.6.25
I'm told (by Ralf) that removing this support will break Castle Wolfenstein or
something like that.
So unless you want hordes of rampaging MIPS users breakin
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 14:40 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:46:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 03:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:57:31 + David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > SL Baur
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:46:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 03:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:57:31 + David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > SL Baur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please take the emacsism out of t
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 03:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:57:31 + David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > SL Baur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Please take the emacsism out of the file as it bothers Andrew and others.
> >
> > I thought Andrew said it did
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:57:31 + David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SL Baur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please take the emacsism out of the file as it bothers Andrew and others.
>
> I thought Andrew said it didn't bother him. I assume he was curious.
>
Well it's just one line -
SL Baur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please take the emacsism out of the file as it bothers Andrew and others.
I thought Andrew said it didn't bother him. I assume he was curious.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On 11/12/07, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SL Baur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (push '("/Kbuild" . makefile-mode) auto-mode-alist)
>
> Does that work for Kbuild.asm too, more to the point?
Of course. It works for any filename beginning with the string "Kbuild". Major
mode rules
SL Baur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (push '("/Kbuild" . makefile-mode) auto-mode-alist)
Does that work for Kbuild.asm too, more to the point?
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at htt
On 11/12/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:34:40 + David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > +# -*- makefile -*-
> > >
> > > what's that?
> >
> > Ah... That tells emacs that it's a makefile. In Kbuil
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:34:40 + David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > +# -*- makefile -*-
> >
> > what's that?
>
> Ah... That tells emacs that it's a makefile. In Kbuild.asm emacs thinks its
> an Assembly file and not a makefile. This
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +# -*- makefile -*-
>
> what's that?
Ah... That tells emacs that it's a makefile. In Kbuild.asm emacs thinks its
an Assembly file and not a makefile. This causes it to attempt to do
automatic indentation on it. Do you want me to drop these annotat
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One problem is that EXPORT_SYMBOL always creates a reference to the function
> even when nothing uses it.
Exactly. This function is for use in something that can be compiled as a
module, therefore this sort of thing is academic - unless we take away the
ab
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 04:46:26PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > My thoughts go more into the direction that we have hundreds of similar
> > cases where e.g. a VFS function might currently only by used by OCFS2
> > and therefore be dead code for most users, and the only maintainable
> > solution
> My thoughts go more into the direction that we have hundreds of similar
> cases where e.g. a VFS function might currently only by used by OCFS2
> and therefore be dead code for most users, and the only maintainable
> solution will be to solve these at the compiler and/or linker level.
-ffuncti
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 03:03:56PM +, David Howells wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's BTW not an improvement that you do not only rename them but change
> > such big functions to static inline functions in header files.
>
> I'm not sure what you meant by that.
>
> R
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's BTW not an improvement that you do not only rename them but change
> such big functions to static inline functions in header files.
I'm not sure what you meant by that.
Renaming them indicates more clearly that their only purpose is for A.OUT
suppor
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:59:29PM +, David Howells wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - too many cleanups lumped into one patch
>
> Perhaps, but unfortunately a lot of them are related and required for a
> compilable patch. I can probably split it up 4 ways if you really
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - too many cleanups lumped into one patch
Perhaps, but unfortunately a lot of them are related and required for a
compilable patch. I can probably split it up 4 ways if you really want me
to, in order:
(1) Move STACK_TOP[_MAX].
(2) Rename dump_thread(
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:34:37PM +, David Howells wrote:
> Suppress A.OUT library support if CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT is not set.
>
> Not all architectures support the A.OUT binfmt, so the ELF binfmt should not
> be permitted to go looking for A.OUT libraries to load in such a case. Not
> only th
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:34:37 + David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/Kbuild
> +++ b/include/linux/Kbuild
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +# -*- makefile -*-
what's that?
> header-y += byteorder/
> header-y += dvb/
> header-y += hdlc/
> @@ -17,7 +18,9 @@ header-y += usb/
>
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
