From: Matt Fleming
There are currently two implementations of the utf16 string functions.
Somewhat confusingly, they've got different names.
Centralise the functions in efi.h.
Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen
Tested-by: Tom Gundersen
Reviewed-by: Mike Waychison
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming
---
dr
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 15:00 -0700, Mike Waychison wrote:
> fwiw, I was tempted to rename these to ucs2_*() last time I was here.
We should definitely do that. The functions aren't implementing UTF-16.
Note that Windows *does* now implement UTF16 I think, but EFI still
claims to be UCS2 only.
If
fwiw, I was tempted to rename these to ucs2_*() last time I was here.
Reviewed-by: Mike Waychison
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Matt Fleming
>
> There are currently two implementations of the utf16 string functions.
> Somewhat confusingly, they've got different na
From: Matt Fleming
There are currently two implementations of the utf16 string functions.
Somewhat confusingly, they've got different names.
Centralise the functions in efi.h.
Cc: Tom Gundersen
Cc: Mike Waychison
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming
---
drivers/firmware/efivars.c | 17
4 matches
Mail list logo