Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2016-04-06 Thread Saravana Kannan
On 04/06/2016 02:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On 04/06/2016 02:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On 09/09/2015 05:53 PM, Rafael

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2016-04-06 Thread Saravana Kannan
On 04/06/2016 02:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On 04/06/2016 02:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On 09/09/2015 05:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [cut] Well, nobody was

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2016-04-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On 04/06/2016 02:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Saravana Kannan >> wrote: >>> >>> On 09/09/2015 05:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [cut] >> >>

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2016-04-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On 04/06/2016 02:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Saravana Kannan >> wrote: >>> >>> On 09/09/2015 05:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [cut] >> >> Well, nobody was using that event. >> > > True,

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2016-04-06 Thread Saravana Kannan
On 04/06/2016 02:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On 09/09/2015 05:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 10-09-15, 01:26, Rafael

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2016-04-06 Thread Saravana Kannan
On 04/06/2016 02:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On 09/09/2015 05:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 10-09-15, 01:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, August 03, 2015

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2015-09-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 10-09-15, 01:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, August 03, 2015 08:36:14 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> > What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with >> > CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2015-09-09 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10-09-15, 01:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, August 03, 2015 08:36:14 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with > > CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE > > notifier. > > The above part of the changelog

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2015-09-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, August 03, 2015 08:36:14 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with > CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE > notifier. The above part of the changelog is a disaster to me. :-( It not only doesn't explain

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2015-09-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, August 03, 2015 08:36:14 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with > CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE > notifier. The above part of the changelog is a disaster to me. :-( It not only doesn't explain

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2015-09-09 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10-09-15, 01:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, August 03, 2015 08:36:14 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with > > CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE > > notifier. > > The above part of the changelog

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2015-09-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 10-09-15, 01:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, August 03, 2015 08:36:14 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> > What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with >> > CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is

[PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2015-08-02 Thread Viresh Kumar
What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier. Kill CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE and fix its usage sites. This also updates the numbering of notifier events to remove holes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar ---

[PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

2015-08-02 Thread Viresh Kumar
What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier. Kill CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE and fix its usage sites. This also updates the numbering of notifier events to remove holes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar