Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb/migration: Use set_huge_pte_at instead of set_pte_at

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:41:40PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > The right interface to use to set a hugetlb pte entry is set_huge_pte_at. Use > that instead of set_pte_at. > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi

Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb/migration: Use set_huge_pte_at instead of set_pte_at

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:41:40PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > The right interface to use to set a hugetlb pte entry is set_huge_pte_at. Use > that instead of set_pte_at. > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi

[PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb/migration: Use set_huge_pte_at instead of set_pte_at

The right interface to use to set a hugetlb pte entry is set_huge_pte_at. Use that instead of set_pte_at. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- mm/migrate.c | 21 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/migrate.c

[PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb/migration: Use set_huge_pte_at instead of set_pte_at

The right interface to use to set a hugetlb pte entry is set_huge_pte_at. Use that instead of set_pte_at. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- mm/migrate.c | 21 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index