On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:53:18PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 04/20/2018 04:28 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > Since commit 9b5ba0df4ea4f940 ("ARM: shmobile: Introduce ARCH_RENESAS")
> > is ARCH_RENESAS a more appropriate platform dependency than the legacy
>
>"ARCH_RENESAS is",
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:53:18PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 04/20/2018 04:28 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > Since commit 9b5ba0df4ea4f940 ("ARM: shmobile: Introduce ARCH_RENESAS")
> > is ARCH_RENESAS a more appropriate platform dependency than the legacy
>
>"ARCH_RENESAS is",
On 04/20/2018 04:28 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Since commit 9b5ba0df4ea4f940 ("ARM: shmobile: Introduce ARCH_RENESAS")
> is ARCH_RENESAS a more appropriate platform dependency than the legacy
"ARCH_RENESAS is", no?
> ARCH_SHMOBILE, hence use the former.
>
> This will allow to drop
On 04/20/2018 04:28 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Since commit 9b5ba0df4ea4f940 ("ARM: shmobile: Introduce ARCH_RENESAS")
> is ARCH_RENESAS a more appropriate platform dependency than the legacy
"ARCH_RENESAS is", no?
> ARCH_SHMOBILE, hence use the former.
>
> This will allow to drop
Since commit 9b5ba0df4ea4f940 ("ARM: shmobile: Introduce ARCH_RENESAS")
is ARCH_RENESAS a more appropriate platform dependency than the legacy
ARCH_SHMOBILE, hence use the former.
This will allow to drop ARCH_SHMOBILE on ARM in the near future.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
Since commit 9b5ba0df4ea4f940 ("ARM: shmobile: Introduce ARCH_RENESAS")
is ARCH_RENESAS a more appropriate platform dependency than the legacy
ARCH_SHMOBILE, hence use the former.
This will allow to drop ARCH_SHMOBILE on ARM in the near future.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
---
6 matches
Mail list logo