Hi Hans,
On 2016년 12월 19일 17:18, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19-12-16 07:58, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> This series look good to me. I added the comment
>> for patch4/5. If you agree following two comment, I'll merge these series
>> for 4.11.
>>
>> - patch4 uses the EXTCON_NONE
Hi,
On 19-12-16 07:58, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Hans,
This series look good to me. I added the comment
for patch4/5. If you agree following two comment, I'll merge these series for
4.11.
- patch4 uses the EXTCON_NONE when setting the previous_cable in probe()
- patch5, I don't want to use the d
Hi Hans,
This series look good to me. I added the comment
for patch4/5. If you agree following two comment, I'll merge these series for
4.11.
- patch4 uses the EXTCON_NONE when setting the previous_cable in probe()
- patch5, I don't want to use the dev_info on the fly. So, I want to drop the
pa
Hi Hans,
On 2016년 12월 19일 09:13, Hans de Goede wrote:
> When the extcon_axp288 driver was originally merged, it was merged with
> a dependency on some other driver providing platform data for it.
>
> However such another driver was never merged, so the extcon_axp288 as
> merged upstream has never
When the extcon_axp288 driver was originally merged, it was merged with
a dependency on some other driver providing platform data for it.
However such another driver was never merged, so the extcon_axp288 as
merged upstream has never worked, its probe method simply always returns
-ENODEV.
This co
5 matches
Mail list logo
