On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 01:08:46AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
> Should I resend the patch with your updated changelog?
> Or something else I need to do?
Yeah, please resend with the description updated.
> >> static
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
Should I resend the patch with your updated changelog?
Or something else I need to do?
>
> Subject: idr: fix overflow bug during maximum ID calculation at maximum height
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:49:48PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan
Hello,
Subject: idr: fix overflow bug during maximum ID calculation at maximum height
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:49:48PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> In idr_replace(), when the top layer is the max-high layer(p->layer == 3),
> The "(1 << n)" will overflow and the result is 0, it causes
In idr_replace(), when the top layer is the max-high layer(p->layer == 3),
The "(1 << n)" will overflow and the result is 0, it causes idr_replace()
return -EINVAL even the id is actually valid.
The following test code shows it fails to replace the value for id=((1<<27)+42):
static void
In idr_replace(), when the top layer is the max-high layer(p-layer == 3),
The (1 n) will overflow and the result is 0, it causes idr_replace()
return -EINVAL even the id is actually valid.
The following test code shows it fails to replace the value for id=((127)+42):
static void test5(void)
{
Hello,
Subject: idr: fix overflow bug during maximum ID calculation at maximum height
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:49:48PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
In idr_replace(), when the top layer is the max-high layer(p-layer == 3),
The (1 n) will overflow and the result is 0, it causes idr_replace()
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
Should I resend the patch with your updated changelog?
Or something else I need to do?
Subject: idr: fix overflow bug during maximum ID calculation at maximum height
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:49:48PM +0800, Lai
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 01:08:46AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
Should I resend the patch with your updated changelog?
Or something else I need to do?
Yeah, please resend with the description updated.
static
8 matches
Mail list logo
