Re: [PATCH 1/9] MAINTAINERS: extend mvebu SoC entry with pinctrl drivers

2017-05-23 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > There was no entry for the mvebu pinctrl drivers. As they are tightly > linked to the SoCs and there is a lot of common code to support the > various pinctrl of each SoCs, then add a new entry for the

Re: [PATCH 1/9] MAINTAINERS: extend mvebu SoC entry with pinctrl drivers

2017-05-23 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > There was no entry for the mvebu pinctrl drivers. As they are tightly > linked to the SoCs and there is a lot of common code to support the > various pinctrl of each SoCs, then add a new entry for the mvebu > maintainers. > > Reviewed-by:

[PATCH 1/9] MAINTAINERS: extend mvebu SoC entry with pinctrl drivers

2017-05-19 Thread Gregory CLEMENT
There was no entry for the mvebu pinctrl drivers. As they are tightly linked to the SoCs and there is a lot of common code to support the various pinctrl of each SoCs, then add a new entry for the mvebu maintainers. Reviewed-by: Thomas Petazzoni

[PATCH 1/9] MAINTAINERS: extend mvebu SoC entry with pinctrl drivers

2017-05-19 Thread Gregory CLEMENT
There was no entry for the mvebu pinctrl drivers. As they are tightly linked to the SoCs and there is a lot of common code to support the various pinctrl of each SoCs, then add a new entry for the mvebu maintainers. Reviewed-by: Thomas Petazzoni Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT --- MAINTAINERS |