Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86: change most X86_32 pt_regs members to unsigned long

2008-02-17 Thread Thomas Gleixner
on Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote: > All but ax and orig_ax can move with no changes. > > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86: change most X86_32 pt_regs members to unsigned long

2008-02-08 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Alexey Dobriyan wrote: Why?! You don't have even minimal chances to unify pt_regs for i386 and x86_64. The structure itself, no. Some of the users may very well be candidates for unification, however. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86: change most X86_32 pt_regs members to unsigned long

2008-02-08 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:09:56PM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote: > All but ax and orig_ax can move with no changes. > --- a/include/asm-x86/ptrace.h > +++ b/include/asm-x86/ptrace.h > @@ -36,23 +36,23 @@ struct pt_regs { > #else /* __KERNEL__ */ > > struct pt_regs { > - long bx; > - lo

[PATCH 1/9] x86: change most X86_32 pt_regs members to unsigned long

2008-02-08 Thread Harvey Harrison
All but ax and orig_ax can move with no changes. Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c |5 ++--- arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c |4 ++-- include/asm-x86/ptrace.h | 28 ++-- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 dele