Re: [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: use generic pool-bind/unbind routine for rescuers

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:09:05PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > There are several problems with the code that rescuers bind itself to the > pool' > cpumask > 1) It uses a way different from the normal workers to bind to the cpumask > So we can't maintain the normal/rescuer workers under

Re: [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: use generic pool-bind/unbind routine for rescuers

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:09:05PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: There are several problems with the code that rescuers bind itself to the pool' cpumask 1) It uses a way different from the normal workers to bind to the cpumask So we can't maintain the normal/rescuer workers under the

[PATCH 10/10] workqueue: use generic pool-bind/unbind routine for rescuers

There are several problems with the code that rescuers bind itself to the pool' cpumask 1) It uses a way different from the normal workers to bind to the cpumask So we can't maintain the normal/rescuer workers under the same framework. 2) The the code of cpu-binding for rescuer is

[PATCH 10/10] workqueue: use generic pool-bind/unbind routine for rescuers

There are several problems with the code that rescuers bind itself to the pool' cpumask 1) It uses a way different from the normal workers to bind to the cpumask So we can't maintain the normal/rescuer workers under the same framework. 2) The the code of cpu-binding for rescuer is