Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

2015-10-20 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 20.10.2015 um 12:42 schrieb Alexander Holler: Another idea to split this one file into multiple ones would be to reserve blocks of IDs. E.g. use 1-2 for networking stuff, 1000-1200 for I2C and so on. In detail it could look like driver_ids_base.h: enum { drvid_i2c_base = 1000

Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

2015-10-20 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 20.10.2015 um 12:42 schrieb Alexander Holler: Am 20.10.2015 um 12:30 schrieb Alexander Holler: Am 19.10.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Mark Brown: On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: Am 17.10.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:55:17PM

Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

2015-10-20 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 20.10.2015 um 12:30 schrieb Alexander Holler: Am 19.10.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Mark Brown: On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: Am 17.10.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:55:17PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: Am 17.10.2015 um 1

Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

2015-10-20 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 19.10.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Mark Brown: On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: Am 17.10.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:55:17PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: Am 17.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: A file like th

Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

2015-10-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 17.10.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > >On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:55:17PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > >>Am 17.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > >>>A file like this is going to be a nightmare to mai

Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

2015-10-17 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 17.10.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:55:17PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: Am 17.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:14:23PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: These patch contains the IDs for initcalls I've annotated.

Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

2015-10-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:55:17PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 17.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > >On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:14:23PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > >>These patch contains the IDs for initcalls I've annotated. > >> > >>This patch is NOT meant for merging int

Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

2015-10-17 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 17.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:14:23PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: These patch contains the IDs for initcalls I've annotated. This patch is NOT meant for merging into mainline in its current form. It should be discussed about how to add these I

Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

2015-10-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:14:23PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > These patch contains the IDs for initcalls I've annotated. > > This patch is NOT meant for merging into mainline in its current form. > > It should be discussed about how to add these IDs and in which form, if > the feature ends

[PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

2015-10-17 Thread Alexander Holler
These patch contains the IDs for initcalls I've annotated. This patch is NOT meant for merging into mainline in its current form. It should be discussed about how to add these IDs and in which form, if the feature ends up in mainline at all. E.g. it could make sense to split this file into sever