On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Erik Gilling wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:59 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> Given its the sync driver, its most obvious choice, but I agree its likely
>> to collide with filesystem related or other sync_ named functions that don't
>> have a subsystem prefix.
>>
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:21:24AM -0800, Erik Gilling wrote:
>> As John pointed out, the exynos and msm display and code uses them. I
>> know nvidia is working on adding suport to their tegra tree. My knee
>> jerk reaction is to make the export
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:21:24AM -0800, Erik Gilling wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:59 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> >> Also, EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() perhaps?
> >>
> >> And who is using these exports?
> >
> >
> > From some quick git grepping...
>
> As John pointed out, the exynos and msm display
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:59 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sync_timeline_create);
>>
>> As these are now global, should they be a bit more "specific"? "sync_"
>> seems pretty broad.
>
>
> Given its the sync driver, its most obvious choice, but I agree its likely
> to collide with
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:59 PM, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sync_timeline_create);
As these are now global, should they be a bit more specific? sync_
seems pretty broad.
Given its the sync driver, its most obvious choice, but I agree its likely
to collide
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:21:24AM -0800, Erik Gilling wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:59 PM, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
Also, EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() perhaps?
And who is using these exports?
From some quick git grepping...
As John pointed out, the exynos and msm
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:21:24AM -0800, Erik Gilling wrote:
As John pointed out, the exynos and msm display and code uses them. I
know nvidia is working on adding suport to their tegra tree. My knee
jerk reaction is
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Erik Gilling konk...@android.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:59 PM, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
Given its the sync driver, its most obvious choice, but I agree its likely
to collide with filesystem related or other sync_ named functions that
On 02/28/2013 06:00 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:43:06PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
From: Erik Gilling
This is needed to allow modules to link against the sync subsystem
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst
Cc: Erik Gilling
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Rob Clark
Cc: Sumit Semwal
Cc: Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:43:06PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> From: Erik Gilling
>
> This is needed to allow modules to link against the sync subsystem
>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst
> Cc: Erik Gilling
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Cc: Rob Clark
> Cc: Sumit Semwal
> Cc: Greg KH
> Cc:
From: Erik Gilling
This is needed to allow modules to link against the sync subsystem
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst
Cc: Erik Gilling
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Rob Clark
Cc: Sumit Semwal
Cc: Greg KH
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Android Kernel Team
Signed-off-by: Erik Gilling
From: Erik Gilling konk...@android.com
This is needed to allow modules to link against the sync subsystem
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankho...@canonical.com
Cc: Erik Gilling konk...@android.com
Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
Cc: Rob Clark robcl...@gmail.com
Cc: Sumit Semwal
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:43:06PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
From: Erik Gilling konk...@android.com
This is needed to allow modules to link against the sync subsystem
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankho...@canonical.com
Cc: Erik Gilling konk...@android.com
Cc: Daniel Vetter
On 02/28/2013 06:00 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:43:06PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
From: Erik Gilling konk...@android.com
This is needed to allow modules to link against the sync subsystem
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankho...@canonical.com
Cc: Erik Gilling
14 matches
Mail list logo
