On 08/01/19 04:42, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> From my understanding, this means to move the flush in the
> kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young()
> to kvm_age_hva() and do flush in kvm_age_hva() when young is >0 and "flush"
> parameter is true, right?
Yes.
Paolo
Hi Paolo:
Thanks for your review.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:31 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 07/01/19 04:42, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> >> I'm assuming you're
> >> clearing young to avoid the flush in kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(),
> >> but keeping that flush is silly since it
On 07/01/19 04:42, Tianyu Lan wrote:
>> I'm assuming you're
>> clearing young to avoid the flush in kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(),
>> but keeping that flush is silly since it will never be invoked. Just
>> squash this patch with patch 10/11 so that you can remove the unnecessary
>> flush
Hi Sean:
Thanks for your review.
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 12:12 AM Sean Christopherson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 04:54:05PM +0800, lantianyu1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Lan Tianyu
> >
> > This patch is to flush tlb in the kvm_age_rmapp() when tlb range flush
> > is
From: Lan Tianyu
This patch is to flush tlb in the kvm_age_rmapp() when tlb range flush
is available and flush request is true.
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index
5 matches
Mail list logo