On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 10:08 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> > It's not really a SOC block from a vendor, it's a pseudo-device in a
> > way. The current one that doesn't use the coldfire offload is just
> > compatible "fsi-master-gpio".
> >
> > I can add a vendor but what should it be ? aspeed becau
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 7:16 PM Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 16:30 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:26:02AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > This isn't per-se a real device, it's a pseudo-device that
> > > represents the use of the Aspeed
On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 16:30 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:26:02AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > This isn't per-se a real device, it's a pseudo-device that
> > represents the use of the Aspeed built-in ColdFire to
> > implement the FSI protocol by bitbanging the G
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:26:02AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This isn't per-se a real device, it's a pseudo-device that
> represents the use of the Aspeed built-in ColdFire to
> implement the FSI protocol by bitbanging the GPIOs instead
> of doing it from the ARM core.
>
> Thus it's a
On 27 June 2018 at 08:56, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> This isn't per-se a real device, it's a pseudo-device that
> represents the use of the Aspeed built-in ColdFire to
> implement the FSI protocol by bitbanging the GPIOs instead
> of doing it from the ARM core.
>
> Thus it's a drop-in replace
This isn't per-se a real device, it's a pseudo-device that
represents the use of the Aspeed built-in ColdFire to
implement the FSI protocol by bitbanging the GPIOs instead
of doing it from the ARM core.
Thus it's a drop-in replacement for the existing
fsi-master-gpio pseudo-device for use on syste
6 matches
Mail list logo
