Re: [PATCH 11/18] mm, hugetlb: move down outside_reserve check

2013-07-31 Thread Naoya Horiguchi
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:08:24PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:39:30PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:32:02PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > Just move down outsider_reserve check. > > > This makes code more readable. > > > > > > There is no

Re: [PATCH 11/18] mm, hugetlb: move down outside_reserve check

2013-07-30 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:39:30PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:32:02PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > Just move down outsider_reserve check. > > This makes code more readable. > > > > There is no functional change. > > Why don't you do this in 10/18? Just help to re

Re: [PATCH 11/18] mm, hugetlb: move down outside_reserve check

2013-07-29 Thread Naoya Horiguchi
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:32:02PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > Just move down outsider_reserve check. > This makes code more readable. > > There is no functional change. Why don't you do this in 10/18? Thanks, Naoya Horiguchi > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim > > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hug

[PATCH 11/18] mm, hugetlb: move down outside_reserve check

2013-07-28 Thread Joonsoo Kim
Just move down outsider_reserve check. This makes code more readable. There is no functional change. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 5f31ca5..94173e0 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -2530,20 +2530,6 @@ retry_avoidcopy: re