On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:42:51PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:08:45AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:52:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:17:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > >
Em Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:08:45AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:52:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:17:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > On
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:52:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:17:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:08:45AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:52:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:17:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > On
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:42:51PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:08:45AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:52:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:17:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > >
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:52:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:17:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:17:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > >
Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
The cut'n'paste
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
> > interface that returns bool state of the filesystem mount:
> > true - mounted,
Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
> > interface that returns bool state of the filesystem mount:
> > true - mounted,
Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
> interface that returns bool state of the filesystem mount:
> true - mounted, false - not mounted
Well, why not take the opportunity and call it...
Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
interface that returns bool state of the filesystem mount:
true - mounted, false - not mounted
It will not try to mount the filesystem.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-csvlq2hr43ys3u7nfs2up...@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by:
Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
interface that returns bool state of the filesystem mount:
true - mounted, false - not mounted
It will not try to mount the filesystem.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-csvlq2hr43ys3u7nfs2up...@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by:
Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:17:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > >
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
> > interface that returns bool state of the filesystem mount:
> > true - mounted,
Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
> interface that returns bool state of the filesystem mount:
> true - mounted, false - not mounted
Well, why not take the opportunity and call it...
Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
> > interface that returns bool state of the filesystem mount:
> > true - mounted,
Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
The cut'n'paste
18 matches
Mail list logo