Re: [PATCH 12/17] Add proper definitions for some EFI function pointers.

2013-08-09 Thread Roy Franz
Thanks Mark - I'll get that in the next version of the patches. On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Mark Salter wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:45 -0700, Roy Franz wrote: >> The x86/AMD64 EFI stubs must us a call wrapper to convert between >> the Linux and EFI ABIs, so void pointers are sufficient.

Re: [PATCH 12/17] Add proper definitions for some EFI function pointers.

2013-08-09 Thread Mark Salter
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:45 -0700, Roy Franz wrote: > The x86/AMD64 EFI stubs must us a call wrapper to convert between > the Linux and EFI ABIs, so void pointers are sufficient. For ARM, > the ABIs are compatible, so we can directly invoke the function > pointers. The functions that are used by

Re: [PATCH 12/17] Add proper definitions for some EFI function pointers.

2013-08-07 Thread Roy Franz
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Tue, 06 Aug, at 08:45:08PM, Roy Franz wrote: >> The x86/AMD64 EFI stubs must us a call wrapper to convert between >> the Linux and EFI ABIs, so void pointers are sufficient. For ARM, >> the ABIs are compatible, so we can directly invoke the

Re: [PATCH 12/17] Add proper definitions for some EFI function pointers.

2013-08-07 Thread Matt Fleming
On Tue, 06 Aug, at 08:45:08PM, Roy Franz wrote: > The x86/AMD64 EFI stubs must us a call wrapper to convert between > the Linux and EFI ABIs, so void pointers are sufficient. For ARM, > the ABIs are compatible, so we can directly invoke the function > pointers. The functions that are used by the

[PATCH 12/17] Add proper definitions for some EFI function pointers.

2013-08-06 Thread Roy Franz
The x86/AMD64 EFI stubs must us a call wrapper to convert between the Linux and EFI ABIs, so void pointers are sufficient. For ARM, the ABIs are compatible, so we can directly invoke the function pointers. The functions that are used by the ARM stub are updated to match the EFI definitions. Sign