On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:48:18PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>
> On 26/06/2014 11:30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi Boris,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:26:54AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> >> On 25/06/2014 15:06, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>> Now that we don't depend on anyting in the mach
On 26/06/2014 11:30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:26:54AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> On 25/06/2014 15:06, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> Now that we don't depend on anyting in the mach-at91 directory, we can just
>>> move the driver to where it belongs.
>>>
>>> S
Hi Boris,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:26:54AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>
> On 25/06/2014 15:06, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Now that we don't depend on anyting in the mach-at91 directory, we can just
> > move the driver to where it belongs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
> > ---
> > arch
On 25/06/2014 15:06, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Now that we don't depend on anyting in the mach-at91 directory, we can just
> move the driver to where it belongs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 4
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Ma
Now that we don't depend on anyting in the mach-at91 directory, we can just
move the driver to where it belongs.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 4
arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile| 1 -
drivers
5 matches
Mail list logo