Jiri Slaby writes:
> On 05/16/2013 11:36 AM, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> The benefit from compiling it on non-arm (or non-imx) architectures for
>> me is compilation testing. We don't have a whole lot of architectures
>> with CONFIG_OF so it's nice to give it a stretch.
>
> Yes, the newly added
On 05/16/2013 11:36 AM, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> The benefit from compiling it on non-arm (or non-imx) architectures for
> me is compilation testing. We don't have a whole lot of architectures
> with CONFIG_OF so it's nice to give it a stretch.
Yes, the newly added COMPILE_TEST config option wi
Jiri Slaby writes:
> On 05/08/2013 11:07 AM, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Jiri Slaby writes:
>>
>>> From: Jeff Mahoney
>>>
>>> The chipidea driver currently has needless ifneq rules in the makefile
>>> for things that should be config options.
>>
>> Please elaborate on the "should be" part.
>
On 05/08/2013 11:07 AM, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Jiri Slaby writes:
>
>> From: Jeff Mahoney
>>
>> The chipidea driver currently has needless ifneq rules in the makefile
>> for things that should be config options.
>
> Please elaborate on the "should be" part.
>
>> This can be problematic,
>
Jiri Slaby writes:
> From: Jeff Mahoney
>
> The chipidea driver currently has needless ifneq rules in the makefile
> for things that should be config options.
Please elaborate on the "should be" part.
> This can be problematic,
> especially in the IMX case, since the OF_DEVICE dependency will
From: Jeff Mahoney
The chipidea driver currently has needless ifneq rules in the makefile
for things that should be config options. This can be problematic,
especially in the IMX case, since the OF_DEVICE dependency will be met
on powerpc systems - which don't actually support the hardware via th
6 matches
Mail list logo
