Re: [PATCH 13/16] mm: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep

On 10/3/18 7:38 AM, Lance Roy wrote: > lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements, > since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is > also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked(). Agreed > Signed-off-by: Lance Roy > Cc: Andrew Morton

[PATCH 13/16] mm: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep

lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements, since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked(). Signed-off-by: Lance Roy Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Yang Shi Cc: Matthew Wi