Hi,
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 07:03:55 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>find net | xargs grep -n SIOCINQ
>I suspect you will find unix_ioctl() in net/unix/af_unix.c ?
>BTW, my patch only worked for pipes, not fifos. Ie pipe(), not
>open("/some/fifo.p", ...)
Thanks for your patch. There is a question
Hi,
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 07:03:55 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
find net | xargs grep -n SIOCINQ
I suspect you will find unix_ioctl() in net/unix/af_unix.c ?
BTW, my patch only worked for pipes, not fifos. Ie pipe(), not
open(/some/fifo.p, ...)
Thanks for your patch. There is a question however;
Jan Engelhardt a écrit :
On Apr 2 2007 12:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
The following patch does the right thing for pipes, I let you doing
the same for sockets...
Is struct sock->sk_receive_queue->qlen actually the thing I am
looking for? (Previously, I had struct sock->sk_rcvbuf, which was
On Apr 2 2007 12:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>The following patch does the right thing for pipes, I let you doing
>the same for sockets...
Is struct sock->sk_receive_queue->qlen actually the thing I am
looking for? (Previously, I had struct sock->sk_rcvbuf, which was
obviously wrong.)
Thanks,
Jan
On Apr 2 2007 12:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
The following patch does the right thing for pipes, I let you doing
the same for sockets...
Is struct sock-sk_receive_queue-qlen actually the thing I am
looking for? (Previously, I had struct sock-sk_rcvbuf, which was
obviously wrong.)
Thanks,
Jan
--
-
Jan Engelhardt a écrit :
On Apr 2 2007 12:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
The following patch does the right thing for pipes, I let you doing
the same for sockets...
Is struct sock-sk_receive_queue-qlen actually the thing I am
looking for? (Previously, I had struct sock-sk_rcvbuf, which was
obviously
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:17:24 +0200 (MEST)
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Show the fill status of a pipe (in bytes) when stat'ing one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> fs/stat.c | 31 ++-
> include/linux/un.h|
On Apr 1 2007 22:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:17:24 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>> Show the fill status of a pipe (in bytes) when stat'ing one.
>
>Is this useful? It seems rather an obscure thing, and we generally need a
>good reason to go adding
On Apr 1 2007 22:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:17:24 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Show the fill status of a pipe (in bytes) when stat'ing one.
Is this useful? It seems rather an obscure thing, and we generally need a
good reason to go adding
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:17:24 +0200 (MEST)
Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Show the fill status of a pipe (in bytes) when stat'ing one.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fs/stat.c | 31 ++-
include/linux/un.h|2 ++
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:17:24 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Show the fill status of a pipe (in bytes) when stat'ing one.
>
Is this useful? It seems rather an obscure thing, and we generally need a
good reason to go adding Linux-specific goodies to standard system
Show the fill status of a pipe (in bytes) when stat'ing one.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fs/stat.c | 31 ++-
include/linux/un.h|2 ++
include/net/af_unix.h |3 +++
net/unix/af_unix.c| 10 ++
4 files
Show the fill status of a pipe (in bytes) when stat'ing one.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fs/stat.c | 31 ++-
include/linux/un.h|2 ++
include/net/af_unix.h |3 +++
net/unix/af_unix.c| 10 ++
4 files
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:17:24 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Show the fill status of a pipe (in bytes) when stat'ing one.
Is this useful? It seems rather an obscure thing, and we generally need a
good reason to go adding Linux-specific goodies to standard system calls
14 matches
Mail list logo
