On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 06:48:42PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:13:42 +0300
> Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
> >
> > Move code dealing with numa_distance array from arch/x86 to
> > mm/numa_memblks.c
>
> It's not really numa memblock rela
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:13:42 +0300
Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
>
> Move code dealing with numa_distance array from arch/x86 to
> mm/numa_memblks.c
It's not really numa memblock related. Is this the best place
to put it?
>
> This code will be later reused by arch_
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 04:46:17PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> On 2024-07-16 6:13 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
> >
> > Move code dealing with numa_distance array from arch/x86 to
> > mm/numa_memblks.c
> >
> > This code will be later reused by arch_numa.
> >
On 2024-07-16 6:13 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
>
> Move code dealing with numa_distance array from arch/x86 to
> mm/numa_memblks.c
>
> This code will be later reused by arch_numa.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
> ---
>
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
Move code dealing with numa_distance array from arch/x86 to
mm/numa_memblks.c
This code will be later reused by arch_numa.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 101
5 matches
Mail list logo
