From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:47:09 +0100
> The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
> driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
> which is incorrect.
>
> This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with
>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Li Yang wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
>> >> >The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
>> >> >driver
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Li Yang wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
>> >> >The device is set as wakeup capable using
From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:47:09 +0100
> The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
> driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
> which is incorrect.
>
> This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Li Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
> >> >The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
> >> >driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
> >>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
>> >The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
>> >driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
>> >which is incorrect.
>> >
>> >This patch
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Li Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
> >> >The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
> >> >driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
>> >The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
>> >driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
>> >which is incorrect.
>> >
On 22/09/15 15:04, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:t...@linutronix.de]
[...]
on PPC architectures, the flag did the job. When did this change? Since
when using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is a "misuse"?
It always was. Simply because IRQF_NO_SUSPEND has
er ; Kevin Hao ;
>net...@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: RE: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of
>IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
>
>On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
>> >The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
>> >driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set
On 22/09/15 15:04, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:t...@linutronix.de]
[...]
on PPC architectures, the flag did the job. When did this change? Since
when using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is a "misuse"?
It always was. Simply because IRQF_NO_SUSPEND has
.kernel.org; Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net>; David S.
>Miller <da...@davemloft.net>; Kevin Hao <haoke...@gmail.com>;
>net...@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: RE: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of
>IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
>
>On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Manoil C
u-B08782
>; Kevin Hao ;
>net...@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
>flag
>
>The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
>driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
>whic
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
> >The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
> >driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
> >which is incorrect.
> >
> >This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with
>
; Manoil Claudiu-B08782
; Kevin Hao ;
net...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
flag
The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
which is incorrect
The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
which is incorrect.
This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with
enable_irq_wake instead.
Cc: "David S. Miller"
Cc: Claudiu Manoil
The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
which is incorrect.
This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with
enable_irq_wake instead.
Cc: "David S. Miller"
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
> >The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the
> >driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source
> >which is incorrect.
> >
> >This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with
>
J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net>; David S. Miller
><da...@davemloft.net>; Manoil Claudiu-B08782
><claudiu.man...@freescale.com>; Kevin Hao <haoke...@gmail.com>;
>net...@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
&g
tronix.de>; Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net>; David S. Miller
<da...@davemloft.net>; Manoil Claudiu-B08782
<claudiu.man...@freescale.com>; Kevin Hao <haoke...@gmail.com>;
net...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPE
20 matches
Mail list logo